Document Type : علمی- پژوهشی

Author

Language, Faculty of Archeology, Al-Qadisiyah University, Diwaniyah, Iraq

Abstract

Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic are two theories of linguistics. According to Jakobson, these two processes appear figuratively and virtually in verbal art and are considered a method for identifying literary and artistic styles. Persian literature has several distinct literary periods that can be categorized stylistically based on the poets' inclination toward these axes. In different periods of the Persian language, we observe works that are composed in response to and in the same form and style as famous works, which are referred to as "mujāvāt" in literary terminology. The characteristic feature of these poems is the presence of linguistic signs that guide the audience to the intention and author of the poem. The importance of the art of response, which is specific to Iranians, lies in its role in expanding and disseminating poetry in terms of meaning and placing it in an unfinished and continuous space. Therefore, due to its significance and position in Persian literature, this article examines the literary role and functioning of linguistic axes in some responsive poems using a descriptive-analytical approach. The results of this study demonstrate that poets have paid attention to this matter by aligning their responses with the intended axis and in accordance with it

Keywords

Main Subjects

Aghababaei, S. (2019).  Stylistics of Bidelـe Dehlavi's Poems, based on the linguistic theory of the metaphoric polel and Metonymic pole of Jakobson, Practical Rhetoric & Rhetorical Criticism, 4(1), 11-31
Ahanjan F. & et al. (2024). Hafez's Influence on Khajavi Kermani in Romantic and Mystical Illustrated Themes, Based on Gerard Genet's Intertextual Theory, Islamic art, 19(46), 39-56
Bahmani, Y & Maleki, M. (2015).  Conceptual Study of Conflicts and Its Kinds in Technical Response in Persian Poetry from the Beginning to the Sixth Century, Ancient magazine of Persian literature. 6(1), 71-94. (In Persian)
Chāhārlang, F. & et al. (2021). The Metaphoric and Metonymic Poles of Language in Sharh al-shathiyyat of Rouzbahan Bagali; A Study Based on the Theory of Roman Jakobson, Mystic Literature Quarterly Journal, 17(65), 39-67. (In Persian)
Dehkhoda, A. A. (2006-2011). Dictionary, edited by J. Shahidi & colleagues, vol. 2, Tehran: Publishing and Printing Institute. (In Persian)
Hosseinian, T. (2023). Apple: recovery of lost innocenceA reading of Hamid Mossadegh’s poem in light of Albert Béguin’s, Journal of the Iranian Language and French Literature Association, 19(37), 25-42 theoryhttps://doi.org/10.22129/plume.2023.377180.1239. (In Persian)
Jacobsen (1988). Linguistics and poetics, in Constructivism, Post-Constructivism And Literary Studies, Forozan Sejoudi (Supervisor Of Translators), translated by K. Safavi, Tehran: Hozeh Hanari. (In Persian)
Jacobsen (1989). Poles of metaphor and permission, in Constructivism, Post-Constructivism And Literary Studies, Forozan Sejoudi (Supervisor Of Translators), translated by K. Safavi, Tehran: Hozeh Hanari. (In Persian)
Jakobson, R. (1988). Linguistics and poetics, in constructivism, post-structuralism and literary studies, Translated By K. Safavi,  Forozan Sejoudi (supervisor of translators), Tehran: Hozha Haneri.
Jakobson, R. (1989). Poles of metaphor and permission, in constructionism, post-constructionism and literary studies, Translated By K. Safavi, Forozan Sejoudi (supervisor of translators), Hozha Hanari.
Nikobakht, N. (2001). Satire in Persian poetry: a review of satirical poetry from the beginning to Asr Obeid, Tehran: Tehran University Press. (In Persian)
Pishgar, A. & Zarei Z. (2010). agriculture A stylistic look at the poets' receptions of a Senai ode, Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose (Bahar Adab), 140, 135-252. (In Persian)
Rezaei, A. & Sadrian, Z. (2019) A Paradigmatic-Syntagmatic Analysis of Mohammad Ali Shams al-Din’s “Al-Nazeloon ala al-Riyh, Arabic literature 11(2), 45-65. (In Persian)
Safavi, K. (2012). Introduction to Linguistics in Persian Literature Studies, Vol. 1, Tehran: Scientific Publication. (In Persian)
Scholes, R. (2000). An introduction to Structuralism in Literature, translated by F. Taheri, Tehran: Aghaz. (In Persian)
Shah Hosseini, F. (2011). Investigating the poetic characteristics of Khorasani and Iraqi style poets from the perspective of linguistics, Book of the Month of Literature, 5 (58), 13-16. (In Persian)
Shamisa, S. (2003). Poetry Stylistics, Tehran: Ferdous Publications. (In Persian)
Shamisa, S. (2022). A New Look at Badee, Tehran: Mitra. (In Persian)
Sholes, R. (1994). Poetic theory: Jacobsen and Levi-Strauss against Rifater, translated by M. Farhadpour, Organon, 4(0), pp. 37-56. (In Persian)
Sojodi, F. (2016). Applied Semiotics, Tehran: Nashralam. (In Persian)
Taher, R. (2017). Study of analogies and Shahriar's creative reception of Hafez's sonnets, Shahriar Research Quarterly, 3(12), 283-292. (In Persian)
Third brotherhood, M. (1995). Contradiction and Contradiction Makers, Tehran: Zimfar. (In Persian)
Vezinpour, N. (2002). On Speaking, Tehran, Foroughi Publications. (In Persian)
Zipoli, R. (1995). Answering and follow-up art in Persian poetry, translated by M. Zakari, Academy letter, 2(0), 30-48. (In Persian)
Zulfiqari, H. (2006). Seven military figures and their examples, Journal of Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, 14(52 & 53), 109-67. (In Persian)