Reviewers

Journal Reviewers

Reviewing articles is a time-taking responsibility, therefore, the editorial board and authors of articles in the Journal of Persian Language and Literature of the University of Tabriz are grateful to the esteemed reviewers for accepting the serious responsibility of judging the articles submitted to this journal. Due to its antiquity and special place among the scientific journals of the country, this journal needs experienced reviewers to be able to provide accurate and useful scientific opinions on the received articles in a limited time. It is obvious that maintaining the worthy position of this journal and its increasing promotion as one of the oldest journals in the country in the field of Persian language and literature depends on the scientific knowledge, mastery, skill and experience, and scientific fairness of its respected reviewers.


Responsibilities of the reviewers:

Distinguished reviewers of the journal are expected to consider the following in reviewing the submitted articles:

1. Review manuscript critically but constructively and preparing detailed comments about the manuscript to help authors.

 

2. Recognize the right of authors to comment and defend their research work in articles.

3. Avoid reviewing an article whose content they do not recognize in their field of expertise.

4. Review all supplementary versions of articles after applying the corrections recommended by the author

5. Provide all required information within the requested deadlines

6. Declaring any conflict of interest in the submitted articles

7. Reporting possible research misconduct of the article to the journal

8. Considering the scientific content of the article as a confidential document

9. Not communicating directly with authors (If they know the author/s)

 

10. Not passing on the assigned manuscript to another reviewer.

11. Ensuring the quality and authenticity of the article research

12. Informing the editor if he/she finds the assigned manuscript is under review in any other journal.

 

13. Providing written reasons for their rejection if articles are not accepted for any reason. 

14. Writing comments in original or English language.


Articles to be judged by honorable reviewers must contain the following components:

  • Novelty of the research topic
  • Originality 
  • Scientific reliability
  • Adding new aspects to the existing field of study
  • Observance of research ethics
  • Appropriate structure of the submitted article and its compliance with the regulations for compiling articles in the guide section of the authors of this journal
  • Proper use of available resources
  • Correct observance of grammar and writing etiquette
  • Avoid any scientific misconduct

 

 

 

reviewers process