The Hypothesis of the Reflection of the Mythological Motif of the "Confrontation of Mihr and Bull" In Šāh-Nāma & Other Epics

Document Type : Research article

Author

Assistant Professor of the Department of Persian Language and Literature.Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Razavi Khorasan. Iran

Abstract

Rostam's battle with Div-e Sapid (the White Demon) is the most prominent confrontation between the hero of the Iranian national epic and demons. However, based on the mythological nature of the epic's literary genre and the evidence that has cast a shadow on various aspects of this battle, it seems that the Haft Ḵᵛān-e Rostam was reported and depicted based on the context and characteristics of an older behavioral pattern. The present study believes that from a mythological perspective and by focusing on the Mythological Motif of the Mihr's Bull-Slaying, it is possible to shed light on the context and functions of Rostam's conflict with Div-e Sapid, and to provide a more meaningful interpretation of it compared to Freud's psychoanalytic approach in Mahmoud Omidsālār's recent analysis. By providing other explicit evidence of Mihr's Bull-Slaying manifestations in epic texts, the hypothesis of the reflection of the mythological depiction of "the war between Mihr and Bull" in the Šāh-Nāma can be justified and even proven. The present article is inductive and organized in three parts: introduction, theoretical foundations, and main discussion. The results of the research, while confirming the hypotheses of the article, indicate that the pattern of Mihr's functions as a symbol of light, goodness, and courage has been transferred to heroes and Ayyār, and the evil, darkness, and fear of the mythical Bull, whose sacrifice is a source of salvation and renewal, has been transferred to the Div -Bull and witches of the epic. The presence of guides and enlightenment and blessing from the meat or blood of the sacrificial bull is also among the other notable manifestations of the evidence under discussion.

Highlights

Introduction

Myth is a type of ancient worldview that reports ancient human discoveries and serves as an answer to the unanswered ontological questions of man that scientific and philosophical worldviews have failed to explain. Although the original epic is based on myth, non-ancient epics are not entirely free from the reflection of mythological motifs. In myth, the concepts of good and evil are depicted as generalizations, but epics are more concerned with examples of the two concepts of good and evil. Man in myth is not limited to the historical and epic man, but is a being mixed with the whole world, a mixture of the universe and God. Due to its earthly nature, epic cannot fully adapt itself to the method and application of myth, but it is not completely devoid of the characteristics of myth, because it is rooted in it. The epic man is a mixture of mythological man and earthly man, so his mythological half is magnificent and superhuman, and his earthly side, despite being surrounded by life and death, is influenced by the mythological half. Accordingly, in analyzing the personality and why and how of the epic heroes' actions, one can always look to myth.

 

Methodology

The present study is inductive and is organized in three parts using a descriptive-analytical method. In the first part, an introduction is presented, with the following parts: the problem, questions, hypotheses, background, significance, and the purpose of the research. Then, in the second part, the theoretical foundations of the hypothesis of the reflection of the mythological scene of the confrontation between Mihr and the Cow in the battle of Rostam and the White Demon are explained under four headings: Omidsālār’s psychoanalytic analysis of the battle of Rostam and the White Demon, the mythological analysis of the present study of the aforementioned conflict, the relationship between the Cow and the White Demon, and finally, the justification of the relationship between Rostam and Mihr in two aspects of obtaining the military position and crowning have been examined and proven. Then, in the final part, in order to confirm the positive hypothesis, other similar examples from epic texts have been introduced.

 

Discussion

Indra was one of the gods who became a goddess in Iranian mythology, and some of his heroic and heroic qualities were transferred to the god Mihr. In the reflection of the myth of Mihr’s confrontation with the cow in the epic, the heroes and courtiers assume the functions of Mihr, and according to the numerous available evidence, this recurring archetype is not limited to the Šāhnāmeh and has been repeated many times in epic texts to the extent that it also finds a fundamental function. In this process, Rostam, as a symbol of light and goodness, is considered to be the embodiment of Mihr’s behavioral pattern, and the white demon, which is considered to be the embodiment of darkness and the proliferation of evil, is sacrificed in the place of the first cow so that the concept of growth and life can be realized. The White Demon is the most well-known demon in Iranian mythology, epics, and stories, and has a life span as long as the mythological history of Iran. During the transition from myth to epic, the cow's power in this ancient mythological play is transferred to the White Demon, the embodiment of evil and darkness, and by order of Zāl, Rostam, the representative of light and goodness, who is in charge of the sealed power, defeats the White Demon with a dagger. In this process, Rostam is considered the savior of Kaykāvus and the Iranian army from the magic of the White Demon, and in order to free them from the prison of Māzandarān and restore light to their eyes, he is forced to confront the White Demon and kill him. The destruction of the white demon, like the killing of the bull, is seen as the beginning of a new era of Rostam's opening to the group of heroes, his formalization as the crown giver and renewal of the Kaykāvus kingdom, and the continuation of peace and stability in Iran. At the end of the transition process, the function of the sun god's feast and the offering of the sacrificial bull are interpreted as the feeding of Kaykāvus and the Iranian army from the liver of the white demon and their clear vision. It seems that, however, Rostam, as the most prominent hero of the Šāhnāmeh, often resorts to various secret tricks of the Ayyār in her battles, and moves away from the role of a hero and appears in the role of an Ayyār. In accordance with the model presented in the qualification for the rank of soldier in the spiritual ranks of the Mihr ritual, the test plan of passing Haft Khan for Rostam, in the Šāhnāmeh and killing the white demon and saving Kaykāvus and the Iranians from the embodiment of evil and darkness, is in fact a kind of ceremony of initiation and initiation of the central character of the Šāhnāmeh into the realm of heroism and maturity and his acceptance into the group of heroes and the establishment of the rank of soldier in the Mithraic ritual for Rostam. Rostam, in honor of achieving this spiritual rank, after killing the white demon, first releases Kaykāvus and his companions from captivity, then returns light to their dark vision and places Kaykāvus on the throne of Kiāni again and gives the crown of the Iranian kingdom, which is the symbol of the sun's curl and the rays sent by it (the king), to Kaykāvus, like a soldier returning a Mihr, and is honored with the program of " Crown-giver".

 

Conclusion

In the cases studied, the pattern of Mihr’s functions and earthly appearance as a symbol of light, goodness, and courage has been transferred to heroes and nobles, and the evil, dark, and fearful appearance of the primeval cow, whose sacrifice is a source of salvation and renewal, has been transferred to demon-cows and sorceresses. The presence of guides and the enlightenment and blessing from the meat or blood of the sacrificial cow are also considered to be other notable manifestations of the evidence discussed. The overall conclusion of this study shows that based on a mythological approach, it is possible to provide a more substantiated interpretation of the story of Rostam's fight with the white demon, as well as justify its relationship with the Mihr bull-slaughter ritual, which is not only unique, and not limited to one report, but also analyzed and proven through other evidence.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Akbari Mafāxer, Āraš (2010) Darāmadi bar ahrimanšenāsiye irāni (Introduction to Persian Demonology). 1st ed. Tehran: tarfand. [In Persian].
Āmuzgār, āŽleh (2008) Tārix-e asātiriye irān (Mythological History of Irān). Tehran: samt. [In Persian].
Ardestāni Rostami, Hamidrezā (2025) “Nemud-hāye Mehriye dāstān-e Gayumars” (Mithrāic Manifestations in the Story of Gayumars). Kohan- nāmeye adab-e fārsi (The journal of ancient Persian literature of institute of humanities and cultural studies). vol 16. Issue 1. pp: 1-42. Doi: 10.30465/cpl.2025.49383.3309. [In Persian].
Arrajāni, Frāmarz b. Xodādād (1984) Samak-e ayyār. ed. Parviz nātel xānlari. vol 5. Tehran: Āgāh. [In Persian].
Āydenlu, Sajjād (2009) “Haft xān-e pahlavān” (Hero's haft xān). Nasr pažuhiye adab-e fārsi (Prose studies in Persian literature of the šahid bāhonar of university of Kermān). vol. 12. no 26. pp: 1-28. [In Persian].
Āydenlu, Sajjād (2018) “Naqdi bar ketāb-e butiqā va siyāsat dar Šāhnāme” (A Criticism on Politics and Poetics of Iran's National Epic. The Šāhnāmeh). Naqd-nāmeye zabān va adabyyiāt-e fārsi (Criticism of persian language & literature in institute of humanities and cultural studies). vol. 1. Issue 1. pp: 42-46. Https://literature.ihcs.ac.ir/article_4139.html. [In Persian].
Āzarandāz, Abbās (2025) “Rostam āftāb-e sepidedam, jostāri dar hamānandi-hāye mehr va Rostam” (Rostam, The Dawn Sun, A Study on The Similarities Between Mithra and Rostam). Dāneš va xerad-e hamāsi (Epic knowledge and wisdom). Ferdowsi university of Mashhad. vol. 1. Issue 4 - serial no. 4. Pp: 5-38. Doi: 10.22067/jmels. 2025.94149.1054. [In Persian].
Bahār, Mehrdād (1997) “Āyin-e Mehr va varzeš-e bāstani-ye irān”. Az ostureh ta tarix (From Myth to History). ed. Abolqāsem Esmāʾilpur. Tehran: Češme. [In Persian].
Benveniste, Émile (1975) Din-e Irāni bar pāyeye matn-hāye mohemm-e yunāni (The Persian Religion. According to the Chief Greek Texts). tr. Bahman Sarkārāti. Tehran: Bonyād-e farhang-e Irān (Culture Foundation of Irān). [In Persian].
Biqami, Mohammad Tāheri [tr.] (2002) Dārāb-nāme (The Book of Dārāb). ed. Zabihollāh Safā. vol 2Tehran: Elmi-farhangi. [In Persian].
Davāni, Fozune & Mahbube Xorāsāni & Mohammad Fešāraki (2015) “Baztāb-e namādin-e qorbāniye mitrāʾi, ostoreye koštan-e gāv-e naxostin dar haft peykar-e nezāmi” (Iconic Reflection of Mithraic Sacrifice, Myth of Slaying the First Bull in the Haft Peykar Nezāmi). Matn-šenāsiye adab-e fārsi (Textual criticism of Persian literature of university of Isfahan).  vol. 7. Issue 2. serial no. 2. pp: 1-20. Https://rpll.ui.ac.ir/article_19424.html? Lang=en. [In Persian].
Davis, Dick (2019) “Rostam-e dastān” (Rostam Son of Zāl). tr. Masʾud Jaʾfari Jazi. pāž. Issu 3. pp: 33-52. [In Persian].
Ferdawsi, Abolqāsem (2014) Šāhnāme (The Book of King). ed. Jalāl xāleqi motlaq. vol. 2. Tehran: Markaz-e dāyetatolmaʾāref-e eslāmi (Center for the great islamic encyclopedia). [In Persian].
Irānšān b. Abu’l-Xeyr (1998) Kuš-nāme (The Battles of Kush). ed. Jalāl Matini. Tehran: Elmi. [In Persian].
Kahrizi, Xalil (2025) “Taksir-e šarr; yek bonmāyeye ostoreʾi va gardeš ān dar matn-hāye Irāni” (Proliferation of Evil (A Mythical Motif and Its Circulation in Iranian Texts). Zabān va adabiyyāt-e fārsi (Persian language and literature of university of Tabriz). vol. 77. Issue 250. serial no 250. pp: 55-70. Doi: 10.22034/perlit.2024.62991.3703. [In Persian].
Xāleqi Motlaq, Jalāl (2010) Yaddašthāye Šāhnāme (Shahnameh Notes). vol. 10. 1st ed. Tehran: Markaz-e dāyetatolmaʾāref-e eslāmi (Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia). [In Persian].
Xāleqi Motlaq, Jalāl (2007) Hamāse (epic). 1st ed. Tehran: Markaz-e dāyetatolmaʾāref-e eslāmi (Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia). [In Persian].
Maškur, Mohammad Javād (1976) Seyr-e andiše-hāye dini dar irān (The Course of Religius Thought in Iran). Tehran: Supreme Council for Culture and Arts. Center for Cultural Studies and Coordination. [In Persian].
Nazari Fārsāni, Mohsen (2019) “Rostam sarbāz-e Mehr” (Rustam: Mithrāʼs Soldier). Zabāb-šenāxt (Linguistics of institute of humanities and cultural studies). vol. 10. Issue 2/2. pp: 1-19. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.30465/ls.2020.5066. [In Persian].
Nöldeke, Theodor (2002) “Div-e sapid-e māzandarān” (The White Demon of Mazandaran). tr. Jalāl Xāleqi Motlaq. Soxan-hāye dirine (Ancient Speeches). Ed. Ali Dehbāši. 1st ed. Tehran: Afkār. pp: 411-418. [In Persian].
Omidsālār, Mahmud (2017) Botiqā va siyāsat dar Šāhnāme (Politics And Poetics of Irān's National Epic). The Šāhnāmeh. tr. Farhād Aslāni & Masume Purtaqi. 1st ed. Tehran: Mouqufāt-e Iraj Afšār (Dr. Mahmud Afshar Endowment Foundation). [In Persian].
Razi Hāšem (1980) Mehr / mithrāʾism (Mihr / Mithrāism). Tehran: Farvahar. [In Persian].
Tarsusi, Abu Tāher (1960) Abu-Moslem-nāme (The Battles of Abu Moslem Xorāsāni). ed. Hoseyn Esmāʾili. vol. 3. Tehran: Moʾin & Qatre & the French Iranian studies Association. [In Persian].
Yatim-nāme, manuscript of Dāstān-e Hoseyn-e kord, abbreviation sign [mj]. Shelf mark (1257) in the parliamentary library of Irān. Date of copy: 13th century? [In Persian].
Volume 79, Issue 254 - Serial Number 254
Autumn and Winter 2026
October 2026
Pages 23-40
  • Receive Date: 08 February 2026
  • Revise Date: 25 April 2026
  • Accept Date: 05 May 2026
  • Publish Date: 23 September 2026